I've been using both Flickr and Picasa for some time now and I've finally decided on which one I'm going to use from now on. My decision was based on what you get for a subscription fee around $20-25, but I'm also going to talk about the free memberships and the uploading applications in this post.
So let's start off with Picasa. I've been using Picasa for quite some time since this is a Blogger blog (all images uploaded on my blog are linked to my Picasa Gallery, or actually it's the other way around). It works great for my blog but that's where the lines goes. Picasa still feels a bit like a beta, it has potential but it's just a little too buggy and the features are lacking compared to Flickr's. Here's a list of what I find negative about Picasa.
- Organizing photos. You can choose to organize your photos by date, filename or manually. However, ordering by date (which probably is the best way to organize photos) doesn't really work at all. The first pictures I ever uploaded in one of the albums are in the middle of everything, when they should be either first or last depending on how I order them (ascending or descending). Oh, and it's not even possible to choose if you want to have them in an ascending or descending order.
- Tagging pictures. Tagging is a pain on Picasa, you can't tag a batch of photos, you have to tag them one by one. So tagging is really time consuming, and it's really boring.
- No sub-albums. You can't create sub-albums on Picasa, which means you have to use tags to organize your photos. And looking back at the previous point, tagging is nothing you want to do on Picasa.
- Browsing albums. Loading albums with many pictures can be slow since it has to load a lot of thumbnails.
So how about Flickr? Well, I haven't really found a lot of downsides on Flickr, as a Pro member. Everything works fine, I only got an error message once when I tried to organize my photos, but refreshing the page fixed it. The real downside however is the free membership. The free membership is so limited that it doesn't make any sense to use Flickr at all, for me at least. You can only upload 100 MB per month and others can't access the original files unless you're a Pro member. So if you're not willing to pay, you're probably better off on a free service like Photobucket. A positive thing about Flickr is that everyone's there, just like on YouTube. If you want people to see your photos, Flickr is the way to go, it's where the community is. On Flickr I can also easily set permissions on my uploads, that way I can upload my family photos and only show them to my family and/or friends.
Now I've finally decided on which one I'll be using from now on. Flickr is the winner and the most important reasons are listed below.
- The community is at Flickr.
- For $25 you get unlimited space and all features you need, while you get 10 GB storage on Picasa for $20 and not all the features you might need.
- No sub-albums on Picasa, I want to be able to actually organize my photos.
Visit my Flickr page

